Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
JeremyRand (talk | contribs) (Add inquiry about Software Porting Efforts criteria) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
What are the criteria for listing Software Porting Efforts on the front page? Looks like 0ad and Wine were excluded, and it's not documented why. --[[User:JeremyRand|JeremyRand]] ([[User talk:JeremyRand|talk]]) 14:22, 16 March 2019 (CDT) | What are the criteria for listing Software Porting Efforts on the front page? Looks like 0ad and Wine were excluded, and it's not documented why. --[[User:JeremyRand|JeremyRand]] ([[User talk:JeremyRand|talk]]) 14:22, 16 March 2019 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why not just make a porting category with a list (A-Z) of applications with ongoing ports? | ||
| + | |||
| + | This "Porting" category is then placed on the main page. | ||
Revision as of 07:07, 17 March 2019
New grid layout
The new 2x2 grid layout that HLandau has created looks like a step in the right direction, although I'm confused why each grid region has an unused unstyled div. Is this meant to be used for something in the future, or can it be removed?
Also, there should probably be a discussion on how best to group the four categories; for example, at the moment there are three different links to different parts of the Hardware Compatibility list, which looks to me like a waste of the home page real estate.
Olddellian (talk) 11:13, 10 March 2019 (CDT)
Removed vestigial divs. --HLandau (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2019 (CDT)
Criteria for Software Porting Efforts
What are the criteria for listing Software Porting Efforts on the front page? Looks like 0ad and Wine were excluded, and it's not documented why. --JeremyRand (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2019 (CDT)
Why not just make a porting category with a list (A-Z) of applications with ongoing ports?
This "Porting" category is then placed on the main page.
