Difference between revisions of "Platform Comparison"
m (HLandau moved page User:HLandau/Platform Comparison to Platform Comparison: Moving this out from staging) |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:20, 4 August 2018
Aspect | Talos II | Modern Intel or AMD x86-64 System |
---|---|---|
Hardware Initialization Firmware | Early hardware initialization is performed by the SBE, the firmware for which is open source and user-modifiable. | Early hardware initialization is performed by the Intel Management Engine (ME) or AMD Platform Security Processor (PSP), a closed-source vendor-signed blob which cannot be modified by the end user. The vendor and its select partners can modify the blob at will and/or under external coercion. |
Microcode | POWER9 lacks horizontal or vertical microcode, aside from a few instructions which use a hardcoded sequencer. All instruction decode logic is hardcoded. | Microcode is provided by vendor as an encrypted and vendor-signed blob decrypted and verified by the CPU during boot. Cannot be examined or modified by the end user. See above. |
Auxiliary Processor Code | A number of auxillary processors on the CPU chip perform thermal and power regulation.
The code for these processors is open source and user-modifiable. |
The number or purpose of any auxillary processors on Intel and AMD x86-64 designs is not well documented, though at least one such processor is known to exist on current AMD x86-64 designs (the "System Management Unit"). More may exist.
The code for these processors is not open source; it is unclear whether it is user-modifiable. |
Boot Firmware | Ships with open source and user-modifiable firmware. | A typical vendor x86-64 system uses closed source boot firmware, and in some cases (where "Intel Boot Guard" is used) it may not be user-modifiable either.
Although open source boot firmware such as Coreboot is available, on modern x86-64 systems, it incorporates vendor-supplied binary blobs to perform essential platform initialization. |
Management Firmware | Ships with OpenBMC, an open source and user-modifiable IPMI stack. | A typical x86-64 server uses a closed source IPMI stack, which may or may not be user-modifiable. |
FPGA Firmware | The Verilog source code for the FPGA used for power sequencing is open source. The specific FPGA used was chosen because an open source toolchain exists for it. (As a result, the bitstream can be built on the Talos II itself, allowing self-hosted firmware development.) | A typical x86-64 board may or may not use an FPGA or microcontroller for power sequencing; if used, the bitstream or source code is generally not available. |
NIC Firmware | Integrated BCM5719 Gigabit Ethernet NIC has closed-source but user-modifiable firmware. The device is behind the system IOMMU, so the security threat posed is limited. Work on writing open source replacement firmware is ongoing. Usage is optional; the device can be disabled. An alternative NIC could be used via PCIe. | Varies by board and I/O peripherals. |
SAS/SATA Firmware | Optional PM8068 SAS/SATA controller has closed-source firmware. It is unknown whether it is user-modifiable, but the firmware is of a size and complexity likely to make development of an open source replacement infeasible. The device may be disabled, and boards may be ordered with the SAS/SATA controller not present. An alternative storage controller could be used via PCIe.
Note: Since all known SAS/SATA HDD/SSDs use proprietary firmware, the security advantages of open source storage controller firmware appear limited. The IOMMU protects the system from malicious I/O devices, including both storage controllers and storage devices. |
Varies by board and I/O peripherals. |
Board Schematics | Provided with all shipped boards. | Generally not available. |
Secure Boot | Optional secure boot functionality with an owner-controlled root of trust for both firmware and OS. | Secure boot configuration varies by vendor. Root of trust for OS kernel verification is generally configurable, but root of trust for vendor firmware may be locked to the vendor. |
Trusted Boot | An optional FlexVer module is planned to provide trusted boot. Emphasis on physical tamper-proofing provides greater resilience against physical attack than a standard TPM. Firmware will be open source and user-modifiable. | TPM-based, generally as an optional module. Almost always vulnerable to physical attack (e.g. TPM reset attacks). Currently available TPMs are understood to have closed-source firmware. It is unknown whether this firmware is user-modifiable. |
DRM | Does not contain DRM functionality. | Contains DRM functionality for protection of video content. |
Vulnerability to Meltdown | Shipped without vulnerability to Meltdown. | Most Intel systems are vulnerable to Meltdown without microcode updates, which are encrypted, Intel-signed binary blobs. AMD systems are not vulnerable. Alternatively, can be mitigated via kernel mitigations, but this may cause severe performance loss. |
Vulnerability to Spectre | Shipped with full, highly conservative Spectre mitigation by default, including both inter-process and intra-process mitigations. This carries a substantial performance cost compared to "mitigated" x86, which does not mitigate against intra-process Spectre.
The intra-process Spectre mitigation may be disabled if desired, in order to obtain performance comparable to x86. In this case, it is the responsibility of application programmers who require intra-process Spectre protection to apply mitigations such as retpoline. |
Mitigation of Spectre in full requires firmware updates and OS updates for inter-process mitigation. x86 vendors elected not to mitigate intra-process Spectre in hardware due to the high performance cost; it is the responsibility of application programmers who require intra-process Spectre protection to apply mitigations such as retpoline. (Where application programmers fail to do so, even a "mitigated" system may continue to be vulnerable.) Alternatively an entire OS distribution could be recompiled with retpoline enabled, which is likely to have a high performance cost. |