Difference between revisions of "Porting/FEX-Emu"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JeremyRand (talk | contribs) (Add "See Also" section) |
JeremyRand (talk | contribs) (Add Issue 1650) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[https://fex-emu.org/ FEX-Emu] developers seem open to the possibility of supporting architectures besides x86/ARM, e.g. they have a [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX/pull/1640 WIP RISC-V port]. No issue is yet open for ppc64le support. | [https://fex-emu.org/ FEX-Emu] developers seem open to the possibility of supporting architectures besides x86/ARM, e.g. they have a [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX/pull/1640 WIP RISC-V port]. No issue is yet open for ppc64le support. | ||
| + | |||
| + | = In progress = | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX/issues/1650 [Apple M1/Asahi Linux] <jemalloc>: Unsupported system page size] | ||
| + | ** Also see [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX/issues/1221 Throw an error when compiling and running on a non-4k page host] | ||
= See Also = | = See Also = | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 2 August 2022
FEX-Emu developers seem open to the possibility of supporting architectures besides x86/ARM, e.g. they have a WIP RISC-V port. No issue is yet open for ppc64le support.
